Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc Feud: Chess Grandmaster Slams ‘Not Real Doctors’ Claim in Viral Twitter Clash
The Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud erupted when Indian chess Grandmaster Vidit Gujrathi shared a heartfelt Doctor’s Day post on X (formerly Twitter), featuring a picture of his family and celebrating their contributions to healthcare. He proudly mentioned his father as an Ayurvedic migraine specialist, his wife as an MD in Homeopathy, his mother as a cosmetologist, and his sister as a physiotherapist.
However, what was meant to be a tribute quickly spiraled into controversy when Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips, known online as LiverDoc, commented:
“I am sorry, but none of them are really doctors.”
A prominent hepatologist, LiverDoc has built a reputation on social media for his strong opposition to alternative medicine, especially Ayurveda and Homeopathy. Known for his no-filter commentary, LiverDoc frequently challenges practices he views as pseudoscientific. This time, however, his criticism came across as a personal attack, igniting the now-viral Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud.
His comments drew strong reactions from both fans and followers of Vidit, as well as the broader public, who felt that LiverDoc’s tone was disrespectful, especially in the context of a family tribute.
Vidit didn’t take the insult to his family’s credentials lightly. In a strongly-worded but composed post, he wrote:
“My parents are certified doctors who sacrificed thriving careers to travel with me and shape my journey. They rebuilt themselves, found new ways to heal, and continue helping others with quiet dignity. You don’t have to agree with them. But you don’t get to dismiss them.”
This marked a turning point in the Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud, with many online users siding with the chess Grandmaster for defending his family with grace and asserting the value of their work, regardless of the field they belong to.
In response, LiverDoc tried to clarify that he had no personal animosity towards Vidit or his family. However, he maintained his professional stance:
“Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Cosmetology, or Physiotherapy are not realistic clinical medicine… Only physiotherapy can be considered a legitimate adjunct. The rest, especially homeopathy, are pseudoscience.”
He further emphasized that Doctor’s Day in India commemorates the legacy of Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy, a pioneer of clinical medicine, implying that the professions mentioned by Vidit did not align with that legacy.
Still, his attempt at justification came off as condescending to many, fueling the Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud even more.
Social media platforms exploded with reactions. Some supported LiverDoc’s commitment to scientific integrity, while many criticized his harsh tone and lack of empathy. Hashtags like #IStandWithVidit and #LiverDoc trended on Indian Twitter, showcasing how divisive the feud had become.
Users pointed out that while promoting scientific accuracy is important, dismissing other health practices, especially in a culturally diverse country like India, is insensitive.
In one of his final responses, Vidit stated:
“I made a simple post out of gratitude. When it turned into mocking my family, I stepped in. If that means stepping out of my lane, so be it. You and trolls like you don’t get to decide who’s a doctor.”
This mature stance only strengthened Vidit’s support among fans. Many admired how he balanced respect with assertiveness in the escalating Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud.
Eventually, LiverDoc announced he was “quitting social media chess” with what appeared to be a parting jab:
“Sorry for the checkmate. For a change, talk about chess and try being useful.”
Even in his closing remarks, LiverDoc’s tone was seen as provocative, further cementing the Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud as one of the most talked-about Twitter controversies in recent memory.
This wasn’t just a clash of personalities—it was a collision between two contrasting ideologies:
The Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud brought attention to deeper issues around professional recognition, cultural diversity in medicine, and the limits of online discourse.
One of the major takeaways from the Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud is how public figures must navigate their influence responsibly. It’s crucial to express disagreement without demeaning others, especially when discussing personal choices and professional identities.
While LiverDoc’s points might have had merit in the context of modern medicine, the manner of delivery was criticized for lacking tact. On the other hand, Vidit’s composed response won him widespread admiration for defending his family with dignity.
The Vidit Gujrathi LiverDoc feud is a reminder of how sensitive topics like healthcare, tradition, and professional validation can ignite heated debates online. It also highlights the importance of empathy and humility in public conversations.
Whether you’re a follower of evidence-based science or a believer in holistic health, the key lies in respectful dialogue. As this feud fades from trending charts, it leaves behind lessons in online civility, the value of differing perspectives, and the need to elevate discussions instead of tearing each other down.
Read More : River North Shooting
Overview of the Thomas Partey Rape Charges In a major development, Thomas Partey, the former…
Salman Khan Galwan Valley Poster Tease Sends Fans into a Frenzy. Bollywood megastar Salman Khan…
The Joey Chestnut Hot Dog Eating Contest comeback at Coney Island on the Fourth of…
Texas Flooding Emergency: Catastrophic Rainfall Sparks Deadly Flash Floods Across Central Texas The Texas flooding…
The Jamie Smith Harry Brook partnership has become a major highlight of the ongoing second…
Trump Domestic Policy Bill: Trump Domestic Policy Bill: Controversy, Celebrations, and Public Reactions President Donald…